The House of People’s Representatives’ (HPR) has passed a controversial amendment to the media proclamation, sparking concern among journalists, media rights advocates, and opposition MPs who warn the law could deepen censorship and political control over the press.
The newly ratified legislation, passed this week with only one dissenting vote, places sweeping responsibilities on media outlets—particularly concerning live broadcasts. Under the new law, media institutions are now legally obligated to ensure all live transmissions comply with legal standards both before and during their airing. Violations could result in direct accountability for journalists, and enforcement will be guided by a forthcoming directive.
Critics say the law introduces harsh and impractical burdens that threaten to muzzle an already fragile media landscape.
RELATED POSTS
Beyond the live transmission clause, the amended media law also introduces significant changes to media governance and oversight.
Previously, the Ethiopian Media Authority (EMA) board was composed of nine members appointed by Parliament upon the Prime Minister’s recommendation. These included two representatives from civil society, two from media institutions, two from relevant sectors, and three from government bodies.
Under the new law, board members will now be chosen from the general public and institutions linked to the media. Crucially, the amendment also gives the Prime Minister the authority to appoint the board’s director directly—a change many see as an encroachment on media independence.
